Facebook still blocks Ehradio

 

As of this date, I chose this date as it is the day to celebrate FREEDOM in America

Just in case you were in any doubt of the left wing censorship on this social media Platform here’s a reminder of the power to silence from the land of the first amendment SCARY STUFF Happy 4th (Dec 2017 and counting)

facebook blocks Ehradio2

 

Morning moment Facebook blocks free speech in Canada Dec 21 2017

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/13644331

Advertisements

Obama’s silky lie and FBI bias in the Clinton investigation

This is from The Chicago Tribune for those of you in the UK who can’t see this directly
We are here to help
Column: 

Obama’s silky lie and FBI bias in the Clinton investigation

Of all the silky lies being told in Washington over the findings of the FBI’s inspector general on the biased culture of those investigating Hillary Clinton’s email server, one lie seems to be ignored:

It’s the silky lie told by then-President Barack Obama.

It may have set the tone for the smarmy intrigue detailed in the FBI inspector general’s damning 500-page report on the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.

And Washington is revealed once again as our modern Versailles, a place of courtiers and lickspittles who’d use the Ministry of Justice to serve their ambitions.

Obama told his silky lie when his chosen successor was Hillary Clinton.

Clinton had endangered top secret information by using an unsecured, home-brew email server when she was U.S. secretary of state. Any other American who dared risk top government secrets on a basement server would have faced federal prosecution and prison.

Obama’s lie was told in 2015, when Obama was asked by CBS’ Bill Plante when he learned Mrs. Clinton had used an unsecured email server.

“The same time everybody else learned it, through news reports,” Obama said. He was so silky that you couldn’t even hear his tongue rustling along his teeth.

He waxed on about how his administration was all about “transparency.”

But Obama did not learn about Clinton’s home-brew server like “everybody else.”

According to the inspector general’s report, Obama was in fact one of 13 top government officials communicating with Clinton on her private email server, even as Clinton’s server was targeted by foreign intelligence services.

According to the IG report, before former (and fired) FBI Director James Comey took it upon himself to publicly criticize Clinton (and exonerate her from a criminal charge), a draft of his public address was heavily edited.

It was edited for Hillary Clinton’s benefit, to buttress the case that what she did wasn’t prosecutable.

But Comey’s comments were also edited to protect someone else. The IG report discusses a key paragraph in Comey’s statement summarizing the FBI’s thinking that “hostile actors” had accessed Clinton’s server.

The paragraph, the report said, “referenced Clinton’s use of her private email for an exchange with then President Obama while in the territory of a foreign adversary. This reference was later changed to ‘another senior government official,’ and ultimately was omitted.”

Obama cut his political teeth in Chicago. And Chicago Democrats are asking taxpayers to help build a great Temple of Love and Fealty to honor that “senior government official.”

And they’ll honor him by name.

Just chew on this apiece: How could Hillary Clinton ever be prosecuted without implicating Obama, who emailed her using a pseudonym?

Obama might have been portrayed as a victim of her use of a private server. She used that server to hide her dealings with the controversial Clinton Foundation from congressional inquiry. She should have been prosecuted.

But then, two things would have happened.

Her campaign would have fallen apart immediately, and along with it, Obama’s legacy.

The Obama White House, the senior pro-Obama bosses of the FBI and just about all the political suits thought Clinton would be our next president.

And who wants to anger the next ruler? Careers were at stake, promotions, perks, power, just as it was back in the day, in old Versailles.

You should read the report for yourself. Ignore the spin that there was no bias found at Obama’s DOJ and FBI.

It crawls with bias. Deals were cut. Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch met on the tarmac with Bill Clinton. Hillary Clinton was shielded from a federal grand jury. Witnesses were allowed to sit with her during questioning. Comey had already decided to clear her before the investigation was complete.

Pro-Clinton FBI investigator Peter Strzok was warned by his lover, pro-Clinton FBI lawyer Lisa Page, that since Clinton would surely win, it wouldn’t be wise to anger the new boss.

When Page panicked, worrying that Trump might actually win the White House in 2016, Strzok told her not to worry.

“No. No, he won’t,” Strzok texted her on an FBI phone. “We’ll stop it.”

By then, he was helping lead a new FBI investigation, the one investigating Trump for possible collusion with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.

Special counsel Robert Mueller, to his credit, dumped Strzok from the probe when Strzok’s anti-Trump passions became clear. But the Mueller probe has been damaged by the IG report.

The Mueller investigation should continue. So should the congressional inquiry into the DOJ and FBI. Americans need sunshine on all of this.

But one thing should be understood here: The Clinton investigation went wrong when it was taken away from capable field agents and handed to the political suits and intriguers. Bias is their coin. Comey was their boss. His reputation has been hurt by the report.

And Trump, vulgar and boastful, was overjoyed to see Comey, a likely witness against him, take such a big public hit.

Trump is no angel. He’s famous for lies. Mueller may indeed be closing in with the Friday jailing of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, who’s accused of witness tampering.

But Trump’s lies are obvious and blustery, like those told by a bad carny hustler.

Trump is no Obama.

Obama was the silky one.

And the silky ones prosper, in Washington, and as they did for a time, at Versailles.

Listen to “The Chicago Way” podcast with John Kass and Jeff Carlin — at wgnradio.com/category/wgn-plus/thechicagoway.

jskass@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @John_Kass

Does Canada still have Free speech?

 

Well the short answer is NO

Trudeau comment

Courtesy of 57genders Trudeau, NO it doesn’t

I am both shocked and disgusted that the MSM in Canada can blindly continue on as though nothing has happened

NOT A WORD from the Opposition NOT A WORD

And they want to take power in 2019

Where is ANDREW SHEERAndrew Scheer

Nothing NOT WORD!

Maybe you should ask yourself why? VOTES VOTES VOTES The Conservative party of Canada think if they keep quiet about this issue

#1 The issue will go away (NO IT WON’T)

#2 That if they say nothing their main supporters don’t know it’s happened (YES THEY DO)

#3 More insidious than the previous ones, they actually think that if they say nothing these ethnic groups who care NOTHING for our culture and freedoms will actually vote for them in 2019 They don’t even know who he is is or their party VERY SAD!

The Liberal Communist party of Canada have in the dead of night sneaked into a Federal Budget something that is absolutely nothing to do with it

Secondly and FAR more importantly do NOT have the legal authority to do so!

NO GOVERNMENT PARTY OR ORGANIZATION OR LEGAL BODY HAVE THE ABILITY  OR THE AUTHORITY TO BYPASS OR IGNORE THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION

Trudeau on Tractor

But TRUDEAU has done just that. Without a whimper or comment.

LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR AND SIMPLE

Trudeau with Iran

Writing laws that amend our charter is beyond the remit of any Federal Government.

This is illegal and The Liberal Communist party should be immediately removed from office by the Governor-General and a General election called on the grounds of UNconstitutional activity in regards to the Current Federal Government

 

IT IS THAT SERIOUS

 

 

 

 

 

Morning moment The Charter is it real? Mar 2018

I did a piece this week and asked which is clear. One produced in the 20th Century that should be clear and unambiguous one produced and ratified in late 1790’s

Both of them are on the same subjects, so I ask you who’s interest is it in, NOT to make the 20th Century clear and precise the first one shown isn’t even about Free speech OR IS IT

People always assume Section #2 is the part about FREEDOM don’t they!

THE SECOND IS CLEAR CLIP from the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution couldn’t be clearer

 

AND THAT’S THE POINT

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/14339237

Morning moment The Charter is it real? Mar 20 2018

Section #1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society

This document was the 1700’s and this amendment came into law in 1791

The 1st Amendment Prohibits Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances

French Language Services Act

Montreal, Quebec, Canadaontario-flag-300x199

Probably the most costly ACT in ONTARIO’s History

Should be repealed

The Federal Government at present (because as we know 57 Genders TRUDEAU doesn’t seem to think our charter is worth anything unless of course, it fits in with his distorted view of democracy) supports the FRENCH language at great cost to the rest of Canada

However, We in Ontario can if we choose to repeal this act

It costs the province Billions of dollars and is, without doubt, one of the many reasons that Ontario runs a massive deficit

Put to a referendum in Ontario the majority of Canadians would scrap it in favor of limited support for the language where just as QUE BEC supports English

In this time of austerity, we can no longer afford such things across our vast Province

Support the second amendment

Unwarranted attacks on the NRA

wayne LaPierreWayne LaPierre

 

If you  believe as WE do that NRA is being targetted by the Liberal Left Media

Then why not turn the boycott on the NRA

Here’s list of Companies you might consider do your own research

because they haven’t

Banks

First National Bank of Omaha,

Delta Air Lines 

United Airlines 

Rental Cars

Avis Budget Group,

Hertz

Alamo,

Enterprise

National

Health

Starkey Hearing Technologies

Insurance

MetLife

Chubb 

Technology, Information and Security

TrueCar

The home security company 

SimpliSafe 

 

ALL THESE COMPANIES want to take away your second amendment

Why else would they stop dealing with NRA

Think about it when you shop

 

 

 

 

 

"Exposing the lies and telling you the Truth! "

%d bloggers like this: