Trade wars a 2 way street

Trade wars

Watch Germany

Trade wars have begun by Brad Macdonald

When it comes to trade, no nation has more at stake than Germany. Berlin quietly sits at the heart of global trade. It has the fourth largest economy in the world, is the world’s third-biggest exporter, and is the engine that drives Europe economically. As Spiegel Online put it, “No other large economy is more reliant on the free exchange of goods and services, on border-free trade and barrier-free exports, than the German economy” (January 28).

Mr. Trump’s views on trade, according to Spiegel, are a “dangerous cocktail for German industry.” This is not hyperbole. America is the single largest importer of German goods. In 2015, it accounted for almost 10 percent of German exports. (And the UK accounted for 7.5 percent.) “Considering that 46.8 percent of Germany’s GDP comes from exports,” explained Geopolitical Futures, “the importance of the U.S. to Germany’s export machine should not be underestimated” (February 6).

Screen Shot 2017-04-26 at 10.53.17 PM

Even a marginal drop in U.S. demand for German goods—and the drop, in the event of a 35 percent tariff, would surely be more than marginal—would have a massive impact on the German economy.

“It is becoming apparent that Trump’s presidency represents a break in the transatlantic relationship, the kinds of which hasn’t been seen since World War ii,” explained Spiegel.

Some looking at this development see Germany and Europe as innocent victims of Donald Trump and Brexit. Germany’s media are doing a marvelous job at selling this narrative. But Germany isn’t a poor, helpless victim. On the contrary, all the uncertainty and tension is giving Berlin an opportunity to develop new trade relationships, to act more aggressively, especially toward the U.S., and to assume a greater leadership in global trade and commerce.

The international community, in general, dislikes President Trump and his vision for America. One consequence is that many nations—European states especially, but others worldwide—are beginning to look to Germany as the new America! The world is rallying behind Berlin as it stands up to Mr. Trump, and we can expect this trend to continue.

It’s still early, but Germany is already gearing up for a fight.

In January, when asked about Mr. Trump’s threat to put a 35 percent tax on some German imports, Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble told German public broadcaster zdf: “I also want to point out that currently, American companies don’t have to tax their gains which they make outside of the U.S. That means that hundreds of billions of untaxed gains, of great American companies, rest in a tax oasis” (Trumpet translation).

more at


A Month of Islam and Multiculturalism in France and Belgium: March 2017

This is a series of clips from this article you can read the whole article at

And now this as the very morning I put this podcast together

April 20. 3 policemen attacked on the streets of Paris,France. One killed 2 seriously wounded

And so it goes on. We all know the cause, We all who is causing it, We all know where it is coming from!

Yet We are still in total and utter denial that there is a problem even to the extent of in Canada making plans to strip Canadians of their right to 'SO CALLED FREE SPEECH" given to us under Section #2 of our Charter...................

by Soeren Kern

Islam and Multiculturalism in France and Belgium

March 2. In a landmark trial at the Paris Children’s Court, a 17-year-old Turkish jihadist, identified only as Yussuf K., was sentenced to seven years in prison for attacking Benjamin Amsellem, a Jewish teacher in Marseille.

Screen Shot 2017-04-21 at 4.38.08 PM

March 2. The European Parliament voted to lift the immunity from prosecution for National Front leader Marine Le Pen for tweeting images of Islamic State violence. Under French law, publishing violent images can be punished by up to three years in prison and a fine of €75,000 euros ($79,000). 

March 4. The mayor of the French port of Calais, Natacha Bouchart, signed a decree prohibiting aid groups from distributing meals to migrants and refugees at the site of the former “Jungle” migrant camp. 

March 6. President François Hollande vowed to “do everything in his power” to prevent Marine Le Pen from winning the upcoming presidential election in France. 

March 7. The 17th Criminal Tribunal of Paris acquitted the Moroccan-born French-Jewish scholar Georges Bensoussan of hate speech charges. 

March 12. Mohammad Khan Wazir, a 30-year-old migrant from Afghanistan, was sentenced by the Criminal Court of Grasse (Alpes-Maritimes) to 18 months in prison for threatening to assassinate the city’s judges.

He allegedly said that he wanted to “go to court with a Kalashnikov to kill them all.” 

March 13. Sonia Imloul, a 43-year-old activist and the former head of a deradicalization program, was found guilty by the Paris Criminal Court of embezzling and laundering public funds. 

March 15. Interior Minister Bruno Le Roux said that French security forces would begin dismantling the Grande-Synthe migrant camp on the northern coast near the port of Dunkirk “as soon as possible” after violent clashes at the site. 

March 16. An Ifop poll found that 71% of French people believe the security situation in France has deteriorated during the past five years.

March 17. A 30-year-old Muslim man yelling “Allahu Akhbar” slit the throats of his father and brother in the courtyard of their apartment building in Paris.

March 17. Presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of the Left Party, proposed a solution to the debate over sharia-compliant meals in French schools.

March 18. Ziyed Ben Belgacem, a 39-year-old French national of Tunisian origin, was shot dead at Paris Orly airport, the second-busiest airport in France, after grabbing a soldier’s gun

March 20. A confidential police report revealed that more than 50 organizations in Molenbeek, a migrant-dominated neighborhood of Brussels, Belgium, are believed to have ties to jihadist terrorism. 

March 20. French Muslims between the ages of 14 and 16 are far more likely than non-Muslims to hold to “religious absolutism” and be “tolerant of taking violent action for ideological reasons” than non-Muslims, according to a survey of radicalism among French high school students. 

March 22. An Ipsos poll for France Television and Radio France found that 61% of the French believe that Islam is incompatible with French society.

March 22. In an interview with De Morgen to mark the first anniversary of the jihadist attacks in Brussels, Mayor Yvan Mayeur warned: “Everyone knows that all mosques in Brussels are in the hands of Salafists.

March 25. French anti-terrorism judges charged two men suspected of involvement in supplying a weapon to the gunman killed at Paris’s Orly airport on March 18 after seizing the weapon of a soldier. 

March 29. Flanders, one of three official regions of Belgium, announced that it will impose new restrictions on the ritual slaughter of animals.

March 30. The French Council of the Muslim Faith (Conseil français du culte musulman, CFCM), the official interlocutor between the French state and the country’s Muslim community, in a bid to curb radical Islam, published a 12-point charter regarding the role of imams in society.

March 31. Up to a thousand Muslims rolled out rugs and prayed on the streets of Clichy, a northern suburb of Paris, to protest the closure of a mosque on rue Estienne-d’Orves. The mosque was shuttered after its lease expired and the municipality voted to turn the building into a library. 


And so it goes on!

Who is manning the Canadian border?

Emerson Manitoba

Today I am featuring a clip from a video that yo can find online and I will put a link to the full video that’s about 15 minutes long but I urge you to watch this.

It should open your eyes to what is really going on with our border with the United States

I want to pose 2  questions among many the first is why are some and I say some of these refugees speaking ‘FRENCH’ strange don’t you think and second

and just as important where is the support from the federal Government to protect the border and just as importantly our citizens in these small overrun towns

It smells, doesn’t it!

Screen Shot 2017-04-20 at 3.40.37 PM

Watch the full-length video, THIS SHOULD SHOCK YOU, if you are NOT a Liberal Communist

Morning Moment FGM in Canada? April 18 2017

Why? Dr Jumana Nagarwala charged with female genital mutilation of 7-year-old girls

This is a horrendous story which WAS covered by Canadian media to a point looking in on the US, not saying as much but giving you the impression in my mind that it wasn’t happening here  Really with our $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (Canadian Free speech laws prevent me from publishing this sorry!)  only applies to this group of people what are the odds of it not going on here here

Detroit-area doctor charged with genital mutilation on girls

Screen Shot 2017-04-18 at 4.07.06 PM

A case of female genital mutilation (FGM) is either discovered or treated at a medical appointment in England every hour, according to the analysis of NHS statistics by a charity.

Between April 2015 and March 2016, there were 8,656 times when women or girls attended doctors’ surgeries or hospitals and the problem was assessed — the equivalent of one every 61 minutes.

LegislationFGM has been a criminal offense in the UK since 1985. In 2003 it also became a criminal offense for UK nationals or permanent UK residents to take their child abroad to have female genital mutilation.

Performing FGM on anyone under the age of 18 became illegal in the U.S. in 1997 with the Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act. As of 2015, 24 US states have specific laws against FGM. States that do not have such laws may use other general statutes, such as assault, battery or child abuse.

In May 1997, the federal government amended the Criminal Code and included the performance of FGM as aggravated assault under section 268(3).[31] Under the Criminal Code, any person who commits an aggravated assault is guilty of an indictable offense and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.[32] A parent who performs FGM on their child may be charged with aggravated assault. Where the parent does not commit the act but agrees to have it performed by another party, the parent can be convicted as a party to the offense under section 21(1) of the Criminal Code.[33]

Legislation. FGM has been a criminal offense in the UK since 1985. In 2003 it also became a criminal offense for UK nationals or permanent UK residents to take their child abroad to have female genital mutilation.

Female genital mutilation: legislation, policy and guidance | NSPCC…/female-genital-mutilation-fgm/legislation-policy-and-guida…

Historically, communities all around the world have practiced FGM for centuries, dating back to the time of pharaohs. Today, FGM is concentrated in 27 African countries, Yemen and Iraqi Kurdistan, but it is also found elsewhere in Asia, the Middle East, and among immigrant communities around the world.[3] FGM has been outlawed or restricted in most of the countries in which it occurs, but the laws are poorly enforced.[4]

Sharia Law who is right? DEBATE: Atheist vs Muslim

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 8.08.28 PM

DEBATE: Atheist vs Muslim (Christopher Hitchens vs Tariq Ramadan) 

Debate at 92nd and street Y October 2010 with moderator Lorrie Goldstein

A very interesting debate that went on for a long long time

The only problem I have with it, that it, bore no resemblance to what he says elsewhere and this is the crux of the matter to me

Well spoken and well-educated people can in many instances give the appearance of meaning. Actually, what they say in this case, documentary evidence to the contrary says otherwise

Here is just one quote

“We are not here to adopt Western values, we are here to colonize the U.S. (and Canada) and spread Islamic sharia law Canada has one of the easiest legal systems to penetrate and advance sharia from within… but if that doesn’t work, we won’t hesitate to use violent jihad.”

Tariq Ramadan

and there many many more!

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 8.05.42 PM

Part #2

Tariq Ramadan Christopher Hitchin

Debate at 92nd and street Y October 2010 with moderator Lorrie Goldstein

The second part of this is the rebuttal by a Christopher Hitchins  who is Christopher Hitchins here’s short version but you can look him up


Having long described himself as a socialist, a Marxist and an anti-totalitarian, Hitchens began his break from the established political left after what he called the “tepid reaction” of the Western left to the controversy over The Satanic Verses, followed by the left’s embrace of Bill Clinton, and the antiwar movement’s opposition to NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the 1990s. His strong support of the Iraq War separated him further

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 8.04.34 PM

Full video can be found at (but it’s long)

President Obama’s hidden legacy

Obama hidden legacy


Former United States President Barack Obama ran his campaign on “change” and said he would “fundamentally transform America.” For eight years he added action to his words, and America has indeed been transformed, fundamentally.

President Donald Trump’s campaign inspired support by opposing Mr. Obama’s transformations. Candidate Trump said undoing what Obama had done would be easy: He could nullify his executive actions by issuing executive actions of his own. When Mr. Trump got to work in January, he began signing them right away.

But is reversing eight years of Obama as simple as signing executive actions with the signature “Donald J. Trump”? Is it as simple as a Republican-controlled Congress repealing laws passed by the previous Democrat-controlled Congresses?

Screen Shot 2017-04-07 at 8.58.22 PM

In reality, President Obama made eight years of systemic changes: not only legal and regulatory, but also cultural, moral and psychological. Some of this transformation of America cannot be reversed.

Let’s start with young Americans. The Obama Justice Department and Education Department enforced policies, regulations and laws that prevent educators from disciplining insubordinate students. They argued that since statistics show that black teenagers are disciplined at a higher rate than white students, American teachers and administrators are racist. Obama’s bureaucracy coerced and even prosecuted schools into leaving two high school generations unrestrained and unpunished. The result is millions of young people who have been educated to throw off rules and laws.

President Obama also attacked America’s prison system, accusing it of systemic racism. He blamed the makeup of jail populations not on law breaking, but on the law itself, particularly the judges and law enforcement officers. He accused police of racism so vile that officers often murder a man simply because he is black.

By the end of Mr. Obama’s second term, it had become much more common to see people marching in the streets, trashing public places, beating people on the sidewalks, and rioting in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore.

Fringe arguments received the vocal support of the highest office in the country. Eight years on, many more Americans now mistrust, disrespect and even attack law enforcement officers. Many hate the law more than they hate the crime.

President Obama, occupying an office created to enforce the law, personally undermined the rule of law, in some cases openly refusing to enforce laws that his office is specifically required to enforce. His enforcement of immigration was lawless at best, completely anti-law at worst.

Mr. Obama gave a presidential endorsement to many more issues that fundamentally weakened America’s culture, economy and security. He flung the doors wide open on entitlement culture and spent hundreds of billions giving away phones, health care, money and more. He hooked tens of millions more people on welfare benefits. He passed a gargantuan health-care law, reportedly the largest tax in history, that was a massive federal overreach into Americans’ personal lives. He became the biggest spender in world history, accumulating twice as much debt as his predecessor and nearly doubling the national debt to almost $20 trillion. Can that be paid back—with interest—with a few signatures?

President Obama also invited inside the White House Black Lives Matter, an organization whose website reveals that it has as much or more to do with anti-constitutional socialism as with race-baiting. He bathed the outside of the White House in the colors of the homosexual/bisexual/transsexual/queer/intersexual/etc. flag, celebrating the newfound right of homosexuals to “marry.” President Trump has said he is not interested in challenging this law, which by itself fundamentally transforms America.

President Obama successfully used the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service as political weapons. He presided over the surveillance of journalists, the mass surveillance of average Americans, and the targeted killing of American citizens involved in terrorism. His Justice Department provided a framework arguing that the federal government sometimes has the legal right to kill Americans without trial, overseas and at home.

The most fundamental transformation President Obama accomplished can be summarized in one word: lawlessness. The most important American office for enforcing laws was occupied by a man who instead enforced his personal will. Unshackling the presidency from its constitutional limitations is one of the most dangerous transformations of all, no matter who occupies the Oval Office. The worst legacy of the Obama administration is the erosion of the rule of law.

In 2017, America is a different nation from what it was on Jan. 20, 2009. To sign away some of Mr. Obama’s policies and laws will be easy, but to confront America’s changed mentality will not. To instead leave it as it is will be easy; to transform it back to the way it was, much less to make it great, will not. That’s because the Obama years appealed to an ugly, destructive and powerful element: our lawless human nature. The only way to truly roll back the Obama years is to change our own hearts and attitudes toward law.


more at

Is this Canada’s version of ‘HOMELAND’?

Trudeau and Pitfield.png

If anyone of you has seen the latest series of homeland, This article is from CTV news this will make you think is this fiction or fact or some way in between

Because in Canada The Liberal Communist party headed by Prime minister of Canada ‘Trudeau’ just about to implement right out in the open the equivalent of the secret CIA internet bunker seen in the latest series of ‘Homeland’

Screen Shot 2017-04-07 at 9.01.40 PM

This technology has the ability to manipulate what you see and hear on your social media thus distorting what you think is really going on in Canada …. I call it propaganda  … what would you call it

The only saving grace we have is at present there is a republican in the Whitehouse that can control what data is fed to the north but let’s be honest it won’t always be that way even though we would like it to be.

Here’s part of the article and I will put a link on my website

One of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s closest friends is benefiting from an exclusive agreement between his data analytics company and the Liberal Party of Canada.

Data Sciences Inc, run by Trudeau’s boyhood friend, Tom Pitfield, is providing the party with “digital engagement” and support services for its powerful voter-contact database, Liberalist.

Neither the party nor Pitfield would say how much the agreement is worth to the firm, which Pitfield set up after his friend was elected party leader.

Pitfield’s wife, Anna Gainey, is the president of the Liberal Party and also a close friend of Trudeau and his wife, Sophie Gregoire. The two families vacationed together at the Aga Khan’s resort in the Bahamas over the Christmas holidays.

A spokesman for the Liberal Party of Canada says Gainey does not get involved in decisions involving her husband’s company.

“Our Party President has, and continues to, recuse herself from all decisions pertaining to Data Sciences,” Braeden Caley wrote in an email.

Two current Data Sciences Inc. employees are on the Liberal Party’s board of directors: Sébastien Fassier is the Liberal’s national vice president (French) and works as Data Sciences vice president of corporate services.

Mira Ahmad, the sister of the prime minister’s press secretary Cameron Ahmad, sits on the board as president of the Young Liberals of Canada and works as Pitfield’s executive assistant at Data Sciences, according to a profile of her in Power & Influence magazine.

“The volunteers who serve on the National Board, and Party staff, take all appropriate steps to eliminate any conflict of interest,” Caley said.

Pitfield denied that his party connections were a factor in his work with the Liberals.

more at