U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech?

Morning moment U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech June 2017

US House of Representatives

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10544/criminalize-free-speech

This is a shocking story I just came across from the gate stone Inst

It appears The United States Congress is quietly trying to reduce the first amendment for those of you who don’t what that is because yo don’t live in the US well it’s Part of the US constitution that I as a Canadian wished we had right now to stop our Communist dictator

Anyway on with this

Screen Shot 2017-06-30 at 9.17.55 PM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12186212

1st amendment

Says

and I have to say Lawyers hate this because it says what it is and no legal combo jumbo we have today

Life would be a lot more concise if they spoke and wrote laws in this manner today (but then there would NO need for them would there!)

Here goes

I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Now it turns out the Congress has other ideas

This is just the headlines but I urge you and in particular ALL Americans listening to look at the full article which I put a link to on my website

The law already prohibits violence and threats of violence, and law enforcement authorities are supposed to prosecute those — intimidation, destruction, damage, vandalism, simple and aggravated assault. What “hate crimes” are not already covered by the law?

Why would the House of Representatives find it necessary to make such redundant statements, if not in order to redefine the concept of a hate crime? Perhaps by including “hate speech”? The current resolution includes most of the major ethnic and religious minorities in the United States so it will have a far better chance of passing, as it will more easily fool Representatives into thinking that the contents of the resolution are harmless.

Would it not be appropriate for the politicians sponsoring and voting for these resolutions, first of all, to find out what drives the organizations responsible for drafting them? The Investigative Project on Terrorism has authored a damning 88-page report about the Muslim Public Affairs Council. American politicians do not seem to have taken much interest in it.

Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission

https://ecofiscal.ca/

Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission

Ecofiscal Canada

Here’s  something I bet a lot of Canadians have never heard about

This won’t interest Americans because for some reason best known to themselves

They seem to have this idea that Canada poses NO threat to them

Let’s just let them think that (I can’t but many people can)

Anyway I have come across this website with the title

Canada’s Ecofisical Commission’

Now I don’t know about you but for me, two things come to mind the first is

What the heck is ‘Ecofisical’ have you noticed these Commies always come up with focus group tested words

Anyway I looked it up

Screen Shot 2017-06-30 at 9.42.15 AM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12186199

This is what I found and you can ‘Google’ it yourself

Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission[1] is an independent economics organization formed in 2014 by a group of Canadian economists from across the country.[2][3] Chaired by McGill University economist Christopher Ragan, the group seeks to broaden the discussion of environmental pricing reform beyond the academic sphere and into the realm of practical policy application.[4]

The Commission focuses on three major policy streams (Climate and Energy, Water, and Livable Cities). Key areas of research and policy include:

Carbon price

Energy subsidies

Water pricing

Municipal user fees

Congestion pricing

Landfill and solid waste pricing

So I decided to look into this ‘COMISSION’ further

Went to their web page which I urge you to do

and read it as far as I am concerned it’s just another Agenda2030 organization

For starters, I found on just one page the following UN garbage they spew

5 Reasons Canada Needs Ecofiscal Solutions

  1. Canada’s natural wealth is fundamental to our prosperity.
  2. We can do better.
  3. This is the smartest way to get serious results.
  4. This is a significant opportunity
  5. This is both our responsibility and our legacy

Then there is an Opportunity to click and read their report

Blah Blah Blah

Same old same old packaged up to be vital if you want drink fresh water and breath clean you know the drill

Finally and I know Canadians will appreciate the irony of this and so will Americans who border Canada alone the St. Lawerence

Of all the places to located YES you guessed MONTREAL and for those who didn’t Montreal Que Bec recently dumped a Billion gallons of raw sewage into the St.Lawerence which straddles the US-Canada border

How ironic maybe they should clean their own backyards before telling us what to do  YOUR THOUGHTS

Morning moment Tim Burton in his own words!

Morning moment Tim Burton in his own words June  28 2017

Tim Burton

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnVtjswwkGU

I want today to highlightht just one example of what’s going on in the European zone

In particular the UK I want you to listen to a relatively short clip

From a UK NEWStalk host who I have to tell you now who is NOW in jail

For going to far in his comments but this is back in 2015

And what ever you may think of his comments now, and remember all I am doing is playing his comments about his country

It basically unlined two things the first being that FREE speech in the UK is being crushed

To benefit a minority of the population in the UK and secondly the same will be happening here in very short order

Makes you think doesn’t it

while you can that is!

Screen Shot 2017-06-29 at 9.28.18 AM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12166723

Right-wing radio host Tim Burton jailed for ‘vile Islamophobic’ trolling of anti-racism campaigner

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tim-burton-radio-host-tell-mama-jailed-racist-islamophobic-fiyaz-mughal-a7707256.html

A right-wing radio host who trolled an anti-hate crime campaigner with “Islamophobic” tweets and emails has been jailed for 12 weeks.

Timothy Burton, 64, branded Islam a “backwards, misogynistic, seventh-century” ideology in a series of emails to Tell Mama founder Fiyaz Mughal OBE between 4 April and 26 April 2016.

Burton also sent Mr Mughal links to far-right blogs containing “vile slurs” against Muslims including a petition called “renounce, reform, or get the hell out of my country”.

The radio presenter for the anti-immigration group Liberty GB was convicted of one count of religiously aggravated harassment in March following a week-long trial at Southwark Crown Court.

Burton, who says he has resigned from the group following his conviction, had denied the charge and claimed he was exercising his right to free speech.

And the article continues but yet again here is another example of one group able to shut another group up

And isn’t that really the point rather than shutting them up just walk away ignore if you don’t like it

He said he insulted Mr Mughal after reading articles suggesting Tell Mama had exaggerated figures about anti-Muslim incidents.

Mr Mughal said in a statement: “The defendant’s actions have led to endless nights of anxiety and fear and a sense of being targeted to my core.”

Judge Alex Gordon said Burton had been on a campaign to tar all Muslims as violent extremists as he jailed him for 12 weeks at Inner London Crown Court on Friday.

He said: “The defendant was found guilty by a jury following a trial in March of religiously aggravated harassment.

“He sent a series of grossly offensive emails to Tell Mama with the obvious intention that they would be, as they were, received by Mr Mughal.

“Not only were these emails offensive, they provided links to deeply offensive material involving a petition called ‘renounce, reform, of get the hell out of my country’.

Morning Moment Pew report President Trump Not liked abroad!

U.S. Image Suffers as Publics Around World Question Trump’s Leadership

America still wins praise for its people, culture and civil liberties

Although he has only been in office a few months, Donald Trump’s presidency has had a major impact on how the world sees the United States. Trump and many of his key policies are broadly unpopular around the globe, and ratings for the U.S. have declined steeply in many nations. According to a new Pew Research Center survey spanning 37 nations, a median of just 22% has confidence in Trump to do the right thing when it comes to international affairs. This stands in contrast to the final years of Barack Obama’s presidency when a median of 64% expressed confidence in Trump’s predecessor to direct America’s role in the world.

http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/06/26/u-s-image-suffers-as-publics-around-world-question-trumps-leadership/

Pew

Today saw the launch of a report from a non-partisan organization PEW and I will put a link on my website on Donald Trumps Administration and President Trump’s appeal around the world

First I have to say, I am NOT surprised and second why should he or America care

Let’s tackle the second first.

Why should anyone care well I assume that the gravitas of America just like an other Country is based on outside perception

If that perception is one of distrust, dislike etc etc you can only be left with one outcome.

Which is NOT good for America’s prestige in the world

However, that being said let’s look at the first point, that I am not surprised

The biggest problem for the world outside of the USA is in my opinion is understanding the USA

Screen Shot 2017-06-27 at 1.26.03 PM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12224476

America is a very proud Country and rightly so, they have done so much for the world and depending on your point of view some good so not but through all that America has done is one thread

That is FREEDOM and FREEDOM and belief that every citizen has the god given right to have it, is that so bad.

Now as for perceptions, this is what people around the world and some YES inside of America need to understand

President Donald Trump ran for one reason, YES to make America great again but beyond that to stop the rot of disbelief that Americans had bread into them for many decades that America was NOT special NOT different and to put quite simply HE (President Trump) does NOT agree with that view

Now finally I need to address perceptions themselves. Where do those come from well obviously from the media be print in the old fashioned way or TV Radio to a lesser extent outside of America and of course the new media I

Speak of course about the Internet without which this that I am doing would not be possible

The so-called MSM are embedded in their views in America, they are NOT impartial same with NEWSPAPERS who are fighting for their very existence and more importantly their relevance

They believe in the UN and in my case Agenda2030 climate change that borders don’t matter that we can all work out our grievances at table in the UN that America is just one Country on an inevitable decline

Multiculturalism is the way forward borders don’t matter redistribution is key police are evil GUNS must be taken away from citizens Oh terrorists are just misunderstood, unemployed teenagers

And we must find them jobs and apologize for plundering their home countries and the world of natural resources to maintain our evil lifestyle

Now I hope you are getting the picture I could go on but this would be an hour

I can sum this up with one phrase

“Control the media control the message” and “control the education of a population control their views”

So it is not surprising to me that the world has this view but let’s see what they think in 4 years very different I think

A Slap in the Face of Canada’s Democracy

Morning moment A Slap in the Face of Canada’s Democracy June 23 2017A Slap in the Face to Democracy

A Slap in the Face to Democracy: Canada’s “Anti-Islamophobia” Motion

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10313/canada-anti-islamophobia-motion

Today While I still can I want to direct you to an article from the gate stone institute

This is entitled

A Slap in the Face to Democracy: Canada’s “Anti-Islamophobia” Motion

“While the NCCM’s open letter does not directly call for Sharia law or the criminalization of criticism of Islam, it does advance the notion that the famously tolerant nation of Canada must set up anti-racism directorates in each province to track instances of Islamophobia, institute a mandatory course on systemic racism for Canadian high school students, and train its police officers to use bias-neutral policing.” — Josh Lieblein, The Daily Caller.

“Now that Islamophobia has been condemned, this is not the end, but rather the beginning… so that condemnation is followed by comprehensive policies,” wrote Samer Majzoub, a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate of the Canadian Muslim Forum — presumably meaning that the next steps are to make it binding.

“The objective of Jihad… warrants that one must struggle against Kufr (disbelief) and Shirk (polytheism) and the worship of falsehood in all its forms. Jihad has to continue until this objective is achieved.” — ICNA Canada website.

Growing concern in Canada over liberal policies benefitting Muslim extremists sheds light on why an “anti-Islamophobia” bill — proposed in the wake of the deadly January 17 Quebec City mosque attack and approved by parliament on March 23 — spurred such heated controversy there.

Screen Shot 2017-06-26 at 1.26.17 PM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12166720

Motion 103, tabled by Liberal Party MP Iqra Khalid, a Muslim representing Mississauga-Erin Mills, calls on the Canadian government to “develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia.” Because the bill makes no mention of any other religious group targeted by bigots, it was opposed by most Conservative Party politicians and a majority of the public.

The real cost of Labor

Morning moment The real cost of Labor June 2017

British Labour Party

While this is still fresh in all of our minds I want to read to part of this document

It is entitled

The UK Labor parties costs THE FACTS

You really should read this and please note there is one glaring omission that of defense ZRO mention of defense that alone should speak volumes to anyone

The FIRST responsibility of a Government or anyone seeking to form one, should be defending its sovereignty

NO mention at all!

This comes from the Guardian newspaper and I will put a link to it on my website

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2017/may/16/what-would-labours-manifesto-cost-pledges-money-guide-details

What would Labour’s manifesto cost? Your at-a-glance guide

The Labour party’s manifesto was accompanied by a document detailing what the pledges would cost, and how Labour intends to raise the money. Here’s a visual guide to the details

Screen Shot 2017-06-20 at 8.33.14 PM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12153474

Please bare in mind that these figures are additional cost increases (Not the existing ones)

What Labour says it will cost

£48.6bn

Universities £11.2bn

Removing university tuition fees and restoring maintenance grants

Schools £6.3bn

Increasing funding, including protection against losses from the new funding formula, free school meals and arts pupil premium

Pre-school £5.3bn

Childcare and early years including more money for Sure Start

Skills £2.5bn

Introducing free FE tuition, equalizing 16-19 funding and restoring EMA

Healthcare £5bn

Healthcare including free car parking but excluding higher pay and capital expenditure

Social care £2.1bn

Nurses £0.6bn

Restore bursaries

State pensions £0.3bn

Uprate state pensions for British pensioners overseas, extending pension credit to those affected by changes to their state pension age since the 1995 Pensions Act

Social security £4bn

Increase ESA by £30pw for those in the work-related activity group, scrap bedroom tax, implement the PiP legal ruling, restore housing benefit for under 21s, scrap bereavement support payment reforms, £2bn of additional funding for universal credit for review of cuts and how best to reverse them, uprate carers’ allowance to the level of JSA

Paternity £0.3bn

Double paternity pay and paternity leave

Barnett consequentials £6.1bn

Increased funding to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland

Public sector pay £4bn

Lift public sector pay cap

Police £0.3bn

Recruit an additional 10,000 police officers to work on community beats

Other current spend items £0.6bn

Including abolition of employment tribunal fees, additional border guards, firefighters and HMRC tax collection staff

Real living wage £0bn

Introduce a real living wage of at least £10 an hour by 2020 with net fiscal benefits ringfenced to provide support to small businesses

How Labour says it will pay for it

£48.6bn

Labour make a £3.9m allowance for ‘additional behavioral change and uncertainty’, reducing the total tax take

Corporation tax £19.4bn

Raising the headline rate to 21% from 2018-19, 24% from 2019-20 and £26% from 2020-21

Income tax £6.4bn

Increase for top 5% of earners by lowering the threshold for the 45p additional rate to £80k (top 5%) and reintroducing the 50p rate on earnings above £123k

Excessive pay levy £1.3bn

A payroll tax, charged against the employer of any individual earning more than a defined limit

Offshore company property levy £1.6bn

A charge made against purchases of residential property by offshore trusts located in known tax havens

Tax avoidance £6.5bn

Linked to Labour’s program to tackle tax avoidance and evasion

Stamp duty £5.6bn

Extension of stamp duty reserve tax to derivatives and removal of exemption

Corporate tax £3.8bn

Efficiency review of corporate tax reliefs

Reversing tax giveaways £3.7bn

On capital gains tax, inheritance tax, bank levy and scrapping the married persons’ tax allowance

VAT on private school fees £1.6bn

Other £2.6bn

Savings on discretionary housing payments from scrapping bedroom tax, soft drinks industry levy spend redirected from capital to revenue, higher rate IPT on medical insurance, reform controlled foreign companies corporation tax regime

EU wants mandatory refugee sharing

Morning moment obligatory sharing of refugees June 19 2017

Pressure to resolve migration crisis could tear EU apart

EU refugee quotas

This article was first published in Jan 2016 but I think this more relevant than ever

As so-called refugees are forced upon us using devious and underhanded methods

That are cold and calculating, with only one purpose in mind that is to implement through the back door

Agenda2030 without any real consideration of the long-term consequences for the western world

There naive belief or they would have you think that, Europe in particular and the West as a whole can absorb what is nothing more than a massive invasion with any long term effects

ALL because THEY MUST at all costs remain in charge

That alone should scare you in Canada we a Prime minister a party or dare I say ALL parties

Screen Shot 2017-06-19 at 4.22.13 PM

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/12120726

Forcing onto Canadians a MASSIVE population shift that will literally destroy the culture of Canada

Just so HE and his party can hold on to power

SO SHORT TERM THINKING rather than considering the welfare and protection and safety of Canadians

Remember this when you vote

Officials say Berlin and Brussels’ plan for obligatory sharing of refugees will trigger heated rows between governments

Berlin and Brussels are pushing for a major overhaul of European asylum policies as the answer to the EU’s unprecedented migration crisis, presaging bitter battles between national governments that threaten to tear the EU apart.

A package of interlinked proposals from the European Commission to be unveiled within weeks will call for permanent obligatory sharing of refugees across the EU as a result of scrapping rules stipulating that asylum seekers have to lodge their claims in the first member country they enter.

The rules, known as the Dublin regulation and dating from the 1990s, are widely viewed as dysfunctional and were abandoned by Angela Merkel last September when she promised Syrians asylum in Germany regardless of where they entered the EU.

The commission announced before Christmas that it would table a revision of the Dublin rules in March. In order to do away with them, there has to be agreement on how to share the refugees pouring into southern frontline states such as Greece and Italy. This issue is toxic and has already caused the biggest east-west split in the EU since the former Soviet bloc countries joined more than a decade ago.

EU officials and diplomats say the March proposals will trigger heated rows between national governments.

“The system does not work anymore. It was not designed for what we have right now, hundreds of thousands of refugees,” said an ambassador to the EU. “We need new rules. We need a new Dublin agreement. Relocation [refugee quotas] should be part of the package. But the debate will be very difficult.”

more at

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/20/pressure-to-resolve-migration-crisis-could-tear-eu-apart